In the previous section we saw some properties of unequal fractions which are helpful for their comparisons. In this section, we will see a more advanced case.
Consider the following example:
• We have two fractions 1⁄2 and 3⁄4 in hand
• Out of the two, 1⁄2 is lesser. That is., 1⁄2 < 3⁄4 (∵ 1 × 4 < 3 × 2)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (1+3)⁄(2+4) = 4⁄6 = 2⁄3
• This new fraction 2⁄3 is greater than 1⁄2. That is., 1⁄2 < 2⁄3 (∵ 1 × 3 < 2 × 2)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 3⁄4. That is., 2⁄3 < 3⁄4 (∵ 2 × 4 < 3 × 3)
• So we can write: 1⁄2 < 2⁄3 < 3⁄4
• That means., the new fraction 2⁄3 lies in between the original two fractions 1⁄2 and 3⁄4
• We have seen how to represent fractions on a number line.
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.34 below
We find that the new fraction 2⁄3 lies in between the original two fractions 1⁄2 and 3⁄4
Another example:
• We have two fractions 5⁄7 and 6⁄11 in hand
• Out of the two, 6⁄11 is lesser. That is., 6⁄11 < 5⁄7 (∵ 6 × 7 < 5 × 11 ⇒ 42 < 55)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (6+5)⁄(11+7) = 11⁄18
• This new fraction 11⁄18 is greater than 6⁄11. That is., 6⁄11 < 11⁄18 (∵ 6 × 18 < 11 × 11 ⇒ 108 < 121)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 5⁄7. That is., 11⁄18 < 5⁄7 (∵ 11 × 7 < 5 × 18 ⇒ 77 < 90)
• So we can write: 6⁄11 < 11⁄18 < 5⁄7
• That means., the new fraction 11⁄18 lies in between the original two fractions 6⁄11 and 5⁄7
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.35
We find that the new fraction 11⁄18 lies in between the original two fractions 6⁄11 and 4⁄7
Another example:
• We have two fractions 8⁄5 and 9⁄7 in hand
• Out of the two, 9⁄7 is lesser. That is., 9⁄7 < 8⁄5 (∵ 9 × 5 < 8 × 7 ⇒ 45 < 56)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (9+8)⁄(7+5) = 17⁄12
• This new fraction 17⁄12 is greater than 9⁄7. That is., 9⁄7 < 17⁄12 (∵ 9 × 12 < 17 × 7 ⇒ 108 < 119)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 8⁄5. That is., 17⁄12 < 8⁄5 (∵ 17 × 5 < 8 × 12 ⇒ 85 < 96)
• So we can write: 9⁄7 < 17⁄12 < 8⁄5
• That means., the new fraction 17⁄12 lies in between the original two fractions 9⁄7 and 8⁄5
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.36
We find that the new fraction 17⁄12 lies in between the original two fractions 9⁄7 and 8⁄5
One more example:
• We have two fractions 3⁄5 and 15⁄12 in hand
• Out of the two, 3⁄5 is obviously lesser. That is., 3⁄5 < 15⁄12 (∵ 3⁄5 is a proper fraction and 15⁄12 is an improper fraction)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (3+15)⁄(5+12) = 18⁄17
• This new fraction 18⁄17 is greater than 3⁄5. That is., 3⁄5 < 18⁄17 (∵ 3⁄5 is a proper fraction and 18⁄17 is an improper fraction)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 15⁄12. That is., 18⁄17 < 15⁄12 (∵ 18 × 12 < 15 × 17 ⇒ 216 < 255)
• So we can write: 3⁄5 < 18⁄17 < 15⁄12
• That means., the new fraction 18⁄17 lies in between the original two fractions 3⁄5 and 15⁄12
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.37
We find that the new fraction 18⁄17 lies in between the original two fractions 3⁄5 and 15⁄12
Based on the above examples we can write: A new fraction (a+p)⁄(b+q) obtained by adding numerators and denominators of two original fractions a⁄b and p⁄q will lie in between the two fractions. Not just 'in between' the two fractions. It follows a strict rule:
• We have two fractions a⁄b and p⁄q in hand
• One of them will be lesser than the other
• The new fraction will be greater than the 'lesser original fraction'
• The new fraction will be lesser than the 'greater original fraction'
■ So the 'lesser original fraction' will lie on the extreme left
■ The 'greater original fraction' will lie on the extreme right
■ The new fraction will lie in between the two
But we must show the proof for all the above:
If a⁄b < p⁄q, Prove that a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
1. We have a⁄b < p⁄q. From this we get aq < pb
2. We have to prove that a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
3. Consider the first two terms: a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q)
4. If (3) is true, then a(b+q) < b(a+p) ⇒ (ab + aq) < (ba + bp)
5. ab is same as ba. That means we have 'one term same' on both sides in (4). They will cancel out each other
6. So the superiority or inferiority of the left side and right side in (4) is decided by aq and bp
8. It is given in (1) that aq < pb. So we find that left side of (4) is indeed inferior.
9. Hence (4) is proved, and consequently, (3) is established
10. Consider the last two terms in (2): (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
11. If (10) is true, then (a+p)q < p(b+q) ⇒ (aq + pq) < (pb + pq)
12. We have 'one term same' on both sides in (11). The term is pq. They will cancel out each other
13. So the superiority or inferiority of the left side and right side in (11) is decided by aq and pb
14. It is given in (1) that aq < pb. So we find that left side of (11) is indeed inferior
15. Hence (11) is proved, and consequently, (10) is established
16. Taking (3) and (10) together we get: a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
So we learned the method to obtain a fraction between 'any two fractions'. Concentrate on the words: 'any two fractions'. The new fraction that we obtain by the above method can become one of the 'any two fractions'. For example, in fig.5.34 above, we obtained 2⁄3 in between 1⁄2 and 3⁄4. The fig. is shown again below:
• Now, 1⁄2 and 2⁄3 can be considered as 'any two fractions'.
• Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+2)⁄(2+3) = 3⁄5
• This 3⁄5 will lie in between 1⁄2 and 2⁄3 . This is shown in the fig.5.38 below:
[The reader is advised to check and confirm whether 3⁄5 indeed lies in between 1⁄2 and 2⁄3]
• 2⁄3 and 3⁄4 can be considered as 'any two fractions'.
• Let us add the numerators and denominators: (2+3)⁄(3+4) = 5⁄7
• This 5⁄7 will lie in between 2⁄3 and 3⁄4 . This is also shown in the fig.5.38 above
• So altogether we get:
1⁄2 < 3⁄5 < 2⁄3 < 5⁄7 < 3⁄4
3⁄5 and 5⁄7 are the two new fractions that we obtained
• We can continue like this for any number of times. For example, we can take 1⁄2 and 3⁄5 as 'any two fractions'
Now we will see some solved examples:
Solved example 5.37
(i) Find 3 fractions which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
(ii) Find 3 fractions, all with denominator 24, which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
(iii) Find 3 fractions, all with numerator 4, which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
Solution:
(i) We know that 1⁄3 < 1⁄2
1. We can use the property: If a⁄b < p⁄q, Then a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
2. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+1)⁄(3+2) = 2⁄5
3. This 2⁄5 will lie in between 1⁄3 and 1⁄2
4. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 2⁄5 < 1⁄2
5. Take 1⁄3 and 2⁄5
6. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+2)⁄(3+5) = 3⁄8
7. This 3⁄8 will lie in between 1⁄3 and 2⁄5
8. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 3⁄8 < 2⁄5 < 1⁄2
9. Take 2⁄5 and 1⁄2
10. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (2+1)⁄(5+2) = 3⁄7
11. This 3⁄7 will lie in between 2⁄5 and 1⁄2
12. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 3⁄8 < 2⁄5 < 3⁄7 < 1⁄2
13. Thus we get 3 fractions: 3⁄8, 2⁄5 and 3⁄7 between 1⁄3 and 1⁄2
(ii) 1. First we write 1⁄3 and 1⁄2 as fractions with denominator 24:
1⁄3 = (1×8)⁄(3×8) = 8⁄24 and 1⁄2 = (1×12)⁄(2×12) = 12⁄24
2. So we get two fractions: 8⁄24 and 12⁄24
3. Now we use the property of fractions with the same denominators:
'When the denominators are the same, the fraction with the larger numerator will be the larger'
4. So the three required fractions are: 9⁄24 , 10⁄24 and 11⁄24
5. So we can write: 8⁄24 < 9⁄24 < 10⁄24 < 11⁄24 < 12⁄24
6. This is same as: 1⁄3 < 9⁄24 < 10⁄24 < 11⁄24 < 1⁄2
(iii) 1. First we write 1⁄3 and 1⁄2 as fractions with numerator 4:
1⁄3 = (1×4)⁄(3×4) = 4⁄12 and 1⁄2 = (1×4)⁄(2×4) = 4⁄8
2. So we get two fractions: 4⁄12 and 4⁄8
3. Now we use the property of fractions with the same numerators:
'When the numerators are the same, the fraction with the smaller denominator will be the larger'
4. So the three required fractions are: 4⁄11 , 4⁄10 and 4⁄9
5. So we can write: 4⁄12 < 4⁄11 < 4⁄10 < 4⁄9 < 4⁄8
6. This is same as: 1⁄3 < 4⁄11 < 4⁄10 < 4⁄9 < 1⁄2
In the next section we will see addition and subtraction with fractions.
Consider the following example:
• We have two fractions 1⁄2 and 3⁄4 in hand
• Out of the two, 1⁄2 is lesser. That is., 1⁄2 < 3⁄4 (∵ 1 × 4 < 3 × 2)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (1+3)⁄(2+4) = 4⁄6 = 2⁄3
• This new fraction 2⁄3 is greater than 1⁄2. That is., 1⁄2 < 2⁄3 (∵ 1 × 3 < 2 × 2)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 3⁄4. That is., 2⁄3 < 3⁄4 (∵ 2 × 4 < 3 × 3)
• So we can write: 1⁄2 < 2⁄3 < 3⁄4
• That means., the new fraction 2⁄3 lies in between the original two fractions 1⁄2 and 3⁄4
• We have seen how to represent fractions on a number line.
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.34 below
Fig.5.34 |
Another example:
• We have two fractions 5⁄7 and 6⁄11 in hand
• Out of the two, 6⁄11 is lesser. That is., 6⁄11 < 5⁄7 (∵ 6 × 7 < 5 × 11 ⇒ 42 < 55)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (6+5)⁄(11+7) = 11⁄18
• This new fraction 11⁄18 is greater than 6⁄11. That is., 6⁄11 < 11⁄18 (∵ 6 × 18 < 11 × 11 ⇒ 108 < 121)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 5⁄7. That is., 11⁄18 < 5⁄7 (∵ 11 × 7 < 5 × 18 ⇒ 77 < 90)
• So we can write: 6⁄11 < 11⁄18 < 5⁄7
• That means., the new fraction 11⁄18 lies in between the original two fractions 6⁄11 and 5⁄7
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.35
Fig.5.35 |
Another example:
• We have two fractions 8⁄5 and 9⁄7 in hand
• Out of the two, 9⁄7 is lesser. That is., 9⁄7 < 8⁄5 (∵ 9 × 5 < 8 × 7 ⇒ 45 < 56)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (9+8)⁄(7+5) = 17⁄12
• This new fraction 17⁄12 is greater than 9⁄7. That is., 9⁄7 < 17⁄12 (∵ 9 × 12 < 17 × 7 ⇒ 108 < 119)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 8⁄5. That is., 17⁄12 < 8⁄5 (∵ 17 × 5 < 8 × 12 ⇒ 85 < 96)
• So we can write: 9⁄7 < 17⁄12 < 8⁄5
• That means., the new fraction 17⁄12 lies in between the original two fractions 9⁄7 and 8⁄5
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.36
Fig.5.36 |
One more example:
• We have two fractions 3⁄5 and 15⁄12 in hand
• Out of the two, 3⁄5 is obviously lesser. That is., 3⁄5 < 15⁄12 (∵ 3⁄5 is a proper fraction and 15⁄12 is an improper fraction)
• We are going to make a new fraction from the two fractions
• For that, we add the numerators and denominators
• So the new fraction is (3+15)⁄(5+12) = 18⁄17
• This new fraction 18⁄17 is greater than 3⁄5. That is., 3⁄5 < 18⁄17 (∵ 3⁄5 is a proper fraction and 18⁄17 is an improper fraction)
• At the same time, this new fraction is less than 15⁄12. That is., 18⁄17 < 15⁄12 (∵ 18 × 12 < 15 × 17 ⇒ 216 < 255)
• So we can write: 3⁄5 < 18⁄17 < 15⁄12
• That means., the new fraction 18⁄17 lies in between the original two fractions 3⁄5 and 15⁄12
• The three fractions are marked on a number line in fig.5.37
Fig.5.37 |
Based on the above examples we can write: A new fraction (a+p)⁄(b+q) obtained by adding numerators and denominators of two original fractions a⁄b and p⁄q will lie in between the two fractions. Not just 'in between' the two fractions. It follows a strict rule:
• We have two fractions a⁄b and p⁄q in hand
• One of them will be lesser than the other
• The new fraction will be greater than the 'lesser original fraction'
• The new fraction will be lesser than the 'greater original fraction'
■ So the 'lesser original fraction' will lie on the extreme left
■ The 'greater original fraction' will lie on the extreme right
■ The new fraction will lie in between the two
But we must show the proof for all the above:
If a⁄b < p⁄q, Prove that a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
1. We have a⁄b < p⁄q. From this we get aq < pb
2. We have to prove that a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
3. Consider the first two terms: a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q)
4. If (3) is true, then a(b+q) < b(a+p) ⇒ (ab + aq) < (ba + bp)
5. ab is same as ba. That means we have 'one term same' on both sides in (4). They will cancel out each other
6. So the superiority or inferiority of the left side and right side in (4) is decided by aq and bp
8. It is given in (1) that aq < pb. So we find that left side of (4) is indeed inferior.
9. Hence (4) is proved, and consequently, (3) is established
10. Consider the last two terms in (2): (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
11. If (10) is true, then (a+p)q < p(b+q) ⇒ (aq + pq) < (pb + pq)
12. We have 'one term same' on both sides in (11). The term is pq. They will cancel out each other
13. So the superiority or inferiority of the left side and right side in (11) is decided by aq and pb
14. It is given in (1) that aq < pb. So we find that left side of (11) is indeed inferior
15. Hence (11) is proved, and consequently, (10) is established
16. Taking (3) and (10) together we get: a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
So we learned the method to obtain a fraction between 'any two fractions'. Concentrate on the words: 'any two fractions'. The new fraction that we obtain by the above method can become one of the 'any two fractions'. For example, in fig.5.34 above, we obtained 2⁄3 in between 1⁄2 and 3⁄4. The fig. is shown again below:
• Now, 1⁄2 and 2⁄3 can be considered as 'any two fractions'.
• Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+2)⁄(2+3) = 3⁄5
• This 3⁄5 will lie in between 1⁄2 and 2⁄3 . This is shown in the fig.5.38 below:
[The reader is advised to check and confirm whether 3⁄5 indeed lies in between 1⁄2 and 2⁄3]
Fig.5.38 |
• Let us add the numerators and denominators: (2+3)⁄(3+4) = 5⁄7
• This 5⁄7 will lie in between 2⁄3 and 3⁄4 . This is also shown in the fig.5.38 above
• So altogether we get:
1⁄2 < 3⁄5 < 2⁄3 < 5⁄7 < 3⁄4
3⁄5 and 5⁄7 are the two new fractions that we obtained
• We can continue like this for any number of times. For example, we can take 1⁄2 and 3⁄5 as 'any two fractions'
Now we will see some solved examples:
Solved example 5.37
(i) Find 3 fractions which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
(ii) Find 3 fractions, all with denominator 24, which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
(iii) Find 3 fractions, all with numerator 4, which are larger than 1⁄3 and smaller than 1⁄2
Solution:
(i) We know that 1⁄3 < 1⁄2
1. We can use the property: If a⁄b < p⁄q, Then a⁄b < (a+p)⁄(b+q) < p⁄q
2. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+1)⁄(3+2) = 2⁄5
3. This 2⁄5 will lie in between 1⁄3 and 1⁄2
4. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 2⁄5 < 1⁄2
5. Take 1⁄3 and 2⁄5
6. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (1+2)⁄(3+5) = 3⁄8
7. This 3⁄8 will lie in between 1⁄3 and 2⁄5
8. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 3⁄8 < 2⁄5 < 1⁄2
9. Take 2⁄5 and 1⁄2
10. Let us add the numerators and denominators: (2+1)⁄(5+2) = 3⁄7
11. This 3⁄7 will lie in between 2⁄5 and 1⁄2
12. So we can write: 1⁄3 < 3⁄8 < 2⁄5 < 3⁄7 < 1⁄2
13. Thus we get 3 fractions: 3⁄8, 2⁄5 and 3⁄7 between 1⁄3 and 1⁄2
(ii) 1. First we write 1⁄3 and 1⁄2 as fractions with denominator 24:
1⁄3 = (1×8)⁄(3×8) = 8⁄24 and 1⁄2 = (1×12)⁄(2×12) = 12⁄24
2. So we get two fractions: 8⁄24 and 12⁄24
3. Now we use the property of fractions with the same denominators:
'When the denominators are the same, the fraction with the larger numerator will be the larger'
4. So the three required fractions are: 9⁄24 , 10⁄24 and 11⁄24
5. So we can write: 8⁄24 < 9⁄24 < 10⁄24 < 11⁄24 < 12⁄24
6. This is same as: 1⁄3 < 9⁄24 < 10⁄24 < 11⁄24 < 1⁄2
(iii) 1. First we write 1⁄3 and 1⁄2 as fractions with numerator 4:
1⁄3 = (1×4)⁄(3×4) = 4⁄12 and 1⁄2 = (1×4)⁄(2×4) = 4⁄8
2. So we get two fractions: 4⁄12 and 4⁄8
3. Now we use the property of fractions with the same numerators:
'When the numerators are the same, the fraction with the smaller denominator will be the larger'
4. So the three required fractions are: 4⁄11 , 4⁄10 and 4⁄9
5. So we can write: 4⁄12 < 4⁄11 < 4⁄10 < 4⁄9 < 4⁄8
6. This is same as: 1⁄3 < 4⁄11 < 4⁄10 < 4⁄9 < 1⁄2
In the next section we will see addition and subtraction with fractions.
No comments:
Post a Comment